Hi Mitchell, thanks for your feedback. I would love to hear more about why you think Coda works best for specific use cases, and not others for you. I will follow up via DM.
On Editors losing flexibility, I think Scott said it best in another reply: “But Coda still maintains the idea of an editor as an architect. Yes, no net-new pages can be added, but any pages that are existing can be architected. New tables made, relationships established, formulas written, buttons configured, automations set, etc. In my mind editors are still far more than editors. And editors are still free!”
We shared a bit more on this in this post, but we debated this change heavily internally (as you might guess), and it was important to us and the team that we maintain the collaborative feel of the product with any changes we make. This felt like the right compromise across the wide range of use cases we’ve seen people use Coda for.