Is there a reason why Calendar can use formula results column for Duration but not for Start Date & Time? Is it likely a programming constraint or a design decision? I’m curious to know if this will always require a workaround or if there’s a chance it will be improved sometime in the future.
Having to use a manually inputted (non formulaic) Date & Time column type - for the Calendar display to work - makes data entry workflows more clunky and resulting tables much less flexible.
The only reason I can think of for formulaically Date/Time field(s) “not working” in a Calendar display is when the concerned Date/Time field(s) don’t effectively return a Date/Time but a list of Date/Time values (most likely a list of 1 Date/Time) …
At least, this seems to be a somewhat common issue for a Timeline display so I guess it could be the same for a Calendar display .
Other than that, as @Agile_Dynamics said, it’s completely feasible to use formulaically defined Start Date/Time in a Calendar display .
Thanks @Agile_Dynamics and @Paul_Danyliuk - turns out it was the formula I using to try combine a Date and Start Time column into a Date & Time. ChatGPT helped with this:
@Adam_Maggs: Depending on your actual setup, you might not necessarily need to go through this formula to create a Date/Time using a Date and a Time field.
Date, Time, Date/Time and Duration are just numbers under the hood …
So, you can actually add a Time value to a Date one to create a Date/Time